MiniMax-M3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs MiniMax-M3: 46.2% more intelligence, 47.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 42.7 | +46.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 46.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $283.18 | −47.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 47.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.25s | 23.52s | −6.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 6.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiniMax-M3MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill