MiniMax-M3 vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 21.4 points higher (29.2 vs 7.8) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3 when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 7.8 | −73.3% Solar Pro 3 is 73.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $159.22 | −70.4% Solar Pro 3 is 70.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.85s | 18.71s | −24.7% Solar Pro 3 is 24.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs MiniMax-M3: 73.3% less intelligence, 70.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
MiniMax-M3Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill