Ministral 3 3B vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: Ministral 3 3B by Mistral or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Small 3.1 scores 2.3 points higher (7.1 vs 4.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($27.8 vs $12.2; both budget class). Pick Mistral Small 3.1 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ministral 3 3B.
| Metric | Ministral 3 3B | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 4.8 | 7.1 | +47.9% Mistral Small 3.1 is 47.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $12.23 | $27.82 | +127.5% Mistral Small 3.1 is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.32s | 11.31s | +240.7% Mistral Small 3.1 is 240.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.10 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Ministral 3 3B: 47.9% more intelligence, 127.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 240.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Ministral 3 3BMistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-3b/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ministral-3-3b/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill