Mistral Small 3.2 vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 17.1 points higher (24.1 vs 7.0) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($502 vs $122; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Mini 4 when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 3.2 | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.0 | 24.1 | +244.3% Solar Mini 4 is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.78 | $502.02 | +312.2% Solar Mini 4 is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.54s | 27.46s | +119.0% Solar Mini 4 is 119.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.20 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Mistral Small 3.2: 244.3% more intelligence, 312.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 119.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Mistral Small 3.2Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-2/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-2/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill