Mistral Small 3.2 vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 3 scores 0.8 points higher (7.8 vs 7.0) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($159 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick Solar Pro 3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.2.
| Metric | Mistral Small 3.2 | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.0 | 7.8 | +11.4% Solar Pro 3 is 11.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.78 | $159.22 | +30.7% Solar Pro 3 is 30.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.50s | 18.94s | +51.5% Solar Pro 3 is 51.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Mistral Small 3.2: 11.4% more intelligence, 30.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Mistral Small 3.2Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-2/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-2/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill