Muse Ember (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Max) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Ember (Max): 6.4% less intelligence, 5325.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 33.7 | −6.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 6.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $117.12 | $6,353.83 | +5325.1% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 54× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 65.20s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 58.30 for $5903.
Muse Ember (Max)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill