Muse Glimmer (High) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Glimmer (High)
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High): 10.9% less intelligence, 353.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 15.6 | −10.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 10.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $661.29 | +353.7% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 4.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.09s | 21.36s | −14.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 14.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Muse Glimmer (High)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill