Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 0.6 points higher (40.2 vs 39.6) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $1385; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.6 | 40.2 | +1.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 1.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,385.40 | $3,172.37 | +129.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.60s | 64.17s | +211.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 211.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh): 1.5% more intelligence, 129.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 211.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill