Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh): 34.6% less intelligence, 37.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 29.5 | −34.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 34.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,655.27 | $2,277.12 | +37.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 37.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.43s | 16.53s | −43.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 43.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill