Muse Wonder (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Which is better for the money: Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.

Trade-off

MetaMuse Wonder (Max)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 52.40
Total cost: $5787

AlibabaQwen3.7 MaxOff the frontier

Intelligence: 29.50
Total cost: $2277

Verdict

Depends on your budget

Muse Wonder (Max) scores 22.9 points higher (52.4 vs 29.5) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.

Metric	Muse Wonder (Max)	Qwen3.7 Max	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	52.4	29.5	−43.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 43.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$5,786.78	$2,277.12	−60.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 60.6% cheaper
End-to-end time (lower is better)	40.70s	16.67s	−59.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 59.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$4.00 / $20.0	$2.50 / $7.50
Input modalities	Text, Image, Speech, Video	Text

Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Wonder (Max): 43.7% less intelligence, 60.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.0% faster end-to-end.

Open this matchup in the interactive picker Muse Wonder (Max): what beats it Qwen3.7 Max: what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.

Muse Wonder (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill