Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 7.2 points higher (33.7 vs 26.5) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1459 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 33.7 | +27.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 27.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $282.51 | $1,458.94 | +416.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 5.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.20s | 64.02s | +932.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 932.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 27.2% more intelligence, 416.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 932.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill