Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores 13.3 points higher (39.8 vs 26.5) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $283; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 39.8 | +50.2% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 50.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $282.51 | $362.72 | +28.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 28.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.20s | 49.52s | +698.7% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 698.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 50.2% more intelligence, 28.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 698.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill