Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 65.3% less intelligence, 41.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 9.2 | −65.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 65.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $286.07 | $405.10 | +41.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 41.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.35s | 6.21s | −2.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill