Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 15.7 points higher (26.5 vs 10.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 10.8 | −59.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 59.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $286.07 | $232.95 | −18.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 18.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.28s | 8.25s | +31.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 31.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 59.2% less intelligence, 18.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill