Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning): 66.5% more intelligence, 64.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 83.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.2 | 30.3 | +66.5% Beam 1.0 is 66.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $896.39 | $318.73 | −64.4% Beam 1.0 is 64.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.91s | 7.58s | −83.8% Beam 1.0 is 83.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.38 / $2.25 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-35b-a3b/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-35b-a3b/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill