Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 3.3 points higher (29.5 vs 26.2) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1965 vs $1165; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Low).
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 26.2 | −11.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 11.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,964.83 | $1,164.93 | −40.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 40.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.58s | 58.18s | +250.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 250.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Qwen3.7 Max: 11.2% less intelligence, 40.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 250.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill