Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 5.5 points higher (45.4 vs 39.9) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $2632; both flagship class). Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.9 | 45.4 | +13.8% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 13.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,632.05 | $4,934.79 | +87.5% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 87.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.00s | 63.87s | −0.2% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 0.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 13.8% more intelligence, 87.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill