Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) scores 12.4 points higher (20.2 vs 7.8) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($2022 vs $159; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.2 | 7.8 | −61.4% Solar Pro 3 is 61.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,022.49 | $159.22 | −92.1% Solar Pro 3 is 92.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.98s | 18.48s | +32.2% Solar Pro 3 is 32.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $3.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning): 61.4% less intelligence, 92.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill