Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Solar Pro 4 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: 33.2% less intelligence, 103.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 26.6 | −33.2% Solar Pro 4 is 33.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $362.72 | $736.82 | +103.1% Solar Pro 4 is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 50.25s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.47 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextSolar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-flash-next/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-flash-next/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill