Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 19.2% more intelligence, 3.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 28.6 | +19.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 19.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $384.14 | −3.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 3.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 17.08s | +41.5% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 41.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.40 for $267.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill