Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 6.1 points higher (30.1 vs 24.0) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($4547 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 30.1 | +25.4% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 25.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $4,546.75 | +1045.7% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 18.76s | +55.4% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 55.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 25.4% more intelligence, 1045.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 55.30 for $3746.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-3-8-flash-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-3-8-flash-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill