Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 7.1 points higher (31.1 vs 24.0) but costs 5.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2169 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 31.1 | +29.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 29.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $2,168.65 | +446.5% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 5.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 15.03s | +24.5% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 24.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 29.6% more intelligence, 446.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGrok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill