Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 10.8 points higher (26.4 vs 15.6) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 15.6 | −40.9% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 40.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $155.87 | −83.4% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 83.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.08s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Apodex 1.1: 40.9% less intelligence, 83.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Apodex 1.1Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill