Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 13.4 points higher (39.8 vs 26.4) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $939; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 39.8 | +50.8% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 50.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,100.06 | +17.1% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 17.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Apodex 1.1: 50.8% more intelligence, 17.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-8-flash-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-8-flash-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill