Apodex 1.1 vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 20.0 points higher (46.4 vs 26.4) but costs 5.3× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 26.4, and Apodex 1.1 when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 46.4 | +75.8% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 75.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $4,967.35 | +429.0% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 5.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 40.07s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Apodex 1.1: 75.8% more intelligence, 429.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Apodex 1.1Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill