Apodex 1.1 vs Kimi K3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 17.2 points higher (43.6 vs 26.4) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.4, and Apodex 1.1 when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Kimi K3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 43.6 | +65.2% Kimi K3 (Max) is 65.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $3,658.07 | +289.5% Kimi K3 (Max) is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 58.57s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Max) vs Apodex 1.1: 65.2% more intelligence, 289.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Apodex 1.1Kimi K3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/kimi-k3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/kimi-k3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill