Celeris-1 vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 30.7 points higher (37.0 vs 6.3) but costs 57× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $60.0; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 37.0 | +487.3% GPT-5.5 (High) is 5.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $3,410.76 | +5585.5% GPT-5.5 (High) is 57× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 19.79s | +2174.7% GPT-5.5 (High) is 2174.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs Celeris-1: 487.3% more intelligence, 5585.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2174.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Celeris-1GPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill