Celeris-1 vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Low)
GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Celeris-1: 241.3% more intelligence, 82.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 658.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 21.5 | +241.3% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $10.63 | −82.3% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 82.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 6.60s | +658.6% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 658.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Celeris-1GPT-6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill