Celeris-1 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick vs Celeris-1: 47.6% more intelligence, 26.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1185.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 9.3 | +47.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 47.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $43.98 | −26.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 26.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 11.18s | +1185.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 1185.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Celeris-1Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill