Celeris-1 vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 46.1 points higher (52.4 vs 6.3) but costs 96× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $60.0; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 52.4 | +731.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 8.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $5,786.78 | +9546.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 96× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 41.43s | +4662.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 4662.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Celeris-1: 731.7% more intelligence, 9546.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4662.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Celeris-1Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill