Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 12.8 points higher (29.7 vs 16.9) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $594; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 29.7 | +75.7% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 75.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $1,935.39 | +225.8% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.18s | 24.90s | +7.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 7.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 75.7% more intelligence, 225.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill