Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 29.4 points higher (64.6 vs 35.2) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($22191 vs $4722; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 35.2, and Grok 4.7 (High) when 35.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 64.6 | 35.2 | −45.5% Grok 4.7 (High) is 45.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22,191.42 | $4,721.61 | −78.7% Grok 4.7 (High) is 78.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 258.66s | 46.50s | −82.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 82.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $8.00 / $40.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback): 45.5% less intelligence, 78.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-2/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill