Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 16.0 points higher (37.8 vs 21.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($94.1 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 21.8 | −42.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 42.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $61.93 | −34.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 34.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 41.73s | +60.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 60.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 42.3% less intelligence, 34.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill