Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Granite 4.2 30B
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Granite 4.2 30B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)
Granite 4.2 30B vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 56.9% less intelligence, 223.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 450.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Granite 4.2 30B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 12.7 | −56.9% Granite 4.2 30B is 56.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $110.83 | +223.0% Granite 4.2 30B is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.13s | 61.27s | +450.5% Granite 4.2 30B is 450.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.16 / $0.65 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Granite 4.2 30BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill