Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 54.8% less intelligence, 176.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 15.6 | −54.8% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 54.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $155.87 | +176.6% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 6.15s | −40.9% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 40.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill