Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 3.6 points higher (38.1 vs 34.5) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($122 vs $56.4; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 38.1 | +10.4% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 10.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $122.05 | +116.6% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 82.02s | +687.9% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 687.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 10.4% more intelligence, 116.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 687.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)GPT-6 Luna (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill