Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 0.9 points higher (42.1 vs 41.2) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $158; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 42.1 | +2.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 2.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $250.48 | +59.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 59.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.98s | 11.89s | −83.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 83.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 2.2% more intelligence, 59.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 83.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill