Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 1.3 points higher (43.4 vs 42.1) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6.1 Sol (Low).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 42.1 | −3.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 3.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $250.48 | −24.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 24.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 347.67s | 12.72s | −96.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 96.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 3.0% less intelligence, 24.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill