Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 13.1 points higher (43.4 vs 30.3) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $319; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Beam 1.0.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 30.3 | −30.2% Beam 1.0 is 30.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $318.73 | −3.5% Beam 1.0 is 3.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 318.48s | 8.02s | −97.5% Beam 1.0 is 97.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 30.2% less intelligence, 3.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill