Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) scores 21.6 points higher (42.3 vs 20.7) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($860 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.3 | 20.7 | −51.1% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 51.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $860.33 | $331.24 | −61.5% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 61.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.14s | 105.67s | +598.0% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 598.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback): 51.1% less intelligence, 61.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 598.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill