Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6 Astra (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 5.1 points higher (56.0 vs 50.9) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($4057 vs $2925; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Astra (High).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 50.9 | −9.1% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 9.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | $2,925.01 | −27.9% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 27.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 127.77s | 59.78s | −53.2% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 53.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 9.1% less intelligence, 27.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)GPT-6 Astra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-astra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-astra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill