Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 23.3 points higher (39.4 vs 16.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $823; both premium class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 16.1 | −59.1% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 59.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $822.85 | −47.3% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 47.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.44s | 27.19s | +137.7% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 137.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 59.1% less intelligence, 47.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 137.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill