Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 15.3 points higher (39.4 vs 24.1) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $1524; both premium class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 24.1 | −38.8% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 38.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $1,524.02 | −2.4% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 2.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 108.99s | +851.9% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 851.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 38.8% less intelligence, 2.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 851.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill