Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 1.5 points higher (46.3 vs 44.8) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $2732; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Opus 5 (Medium).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 46.3 | +3.3% Grok 4.7 (High) is 3.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | $3,880.88 | +42.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 42.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.14s | 25.34s | +92.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 92.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium): 3.3% more intelligence, 42.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill