Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fall… scores 20.1 points higher (40.8 vs 20.7) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($622 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fall… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.8 | 20.7 | −49.3% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 49.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $622.28 | $331.24 | −46.8% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 46.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.26s | 53.29s | +751.3% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 751.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 49.3% less intelligence, 46.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 751.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-medium/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill