Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs GPT-5 mini (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) scores 7.5 points higher (24.3 vs 16.8) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($653 vs $189; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) when you need intelligence above 16.8, and GPT-5 mini (High) when 16.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | GPT-5 mini (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.3 | 16.8 | −30.9% GPT-5 mini (High) is 30.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $652.70 | $188.66 | −71.1% GPT-5 mini (High) is 71.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.35s | 58.74s | +603.5% GPT-5 mini (High) is 603.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $2.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5 mini (High) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low): 30.9% less intelligence, 71.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 603.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)GPT-5 mini (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/gpt-5-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-low/gpt-5-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill