Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 1.4 points higher (29.5 vs 28.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $1218; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.1 | 29.5 | +5.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 5.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.17 | $2,277.12 | +86.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 86.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.01s | 16.67s | +85.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 85.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium): 5.0% more intelligence, 86.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-medium/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill