DeepSeek V3 0324 vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
LongCat 2.0 scores 9.4 points higher (19.1 vs 9.7) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick LongCat 2.0 when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 19.1 | +96.9% LongCat 2.0 is 96.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $544.74 | +2641.5% LongCat 2.0 is 27× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.96s | 35.54s | +616.5% LongCat 2.0 is 616.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
LongCat 2.0 vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 96.9% more intelligence, 2641.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 616.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V3 0324LongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill