DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) by DeepSeek or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Muse Ember (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High): 25.9% more intelligence, 69.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.6 | 36.0 | +25.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 25.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $384.14 | $117.12 | −69.5% Muse Ember (Max) is 69.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.66s | 10.09s | −42.9% Muse Ember (Max) is 42.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.40 for $267.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill