DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-01.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 27.5 points higher (46.0 vs 18.5) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($3153 vs $310; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 18.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 46.0 | +148.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $3,152.80 | +916.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.92s | 85.05s | +2069.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 2069.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 148.6% more intelligence, 916.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2069.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill